Literary criticism of article on The Ehics of Genetic Engineering Essay

Literary criticism of article on The Ehics of Genetic Engineering - Essay ExampleIn fact, people have more to fear from the obstruction of this technology in the sense that giving up on its benefits, in favor of outdated chaste arguments, could lead to more harm than good. Although Koepsell prescribes regulation in order to control potential abuses of this technology, he does not provide a political or scientific framework for managing the risks associated with genic engineering and gives a quite an cursory look at the moral arguments against new technologies. With these weaknesses in mind, one should nonethe slight take Koepsells warnings seriously, as they are not only applicable to genetic engineering but a liberal variety of novel fields in the application of scientific research. The author begins by giving the elemental science behind genetic engineering, which includes basic information about DNA, genes, and genetic disorders. He also approaches the getting even of ethic al challenges, including the secular and non-secular protestations to genetic engineering. Secular arguments tend to focus on dignity at the species level. However, this objection fails in that there is no room for non-arbitrary distinctions between gracious DNA and the DNA of other species. accord in this case requires hands-off for both human DNA and that of crops. The non-secular arguments tend to focus on genetic engineering as something opposed to nature. ... This cost/benefit analysis is presumed to have moral logical implication because it focuses specifically on things that human beings value most. If genetic engineering is beneficial to all of these different areas of human life, then it necessarily must be good. Koepsell devotes some attention to drawbacks of the technological advances however, the only drawback that is addressed is the inseparable unpredictability of genetic crossbreeding between engineering and non-engineered genomes. This is exemplified both in hum an populations, where gene therapies tail end have potentially harmful effects on populations, and in agriculture, where the spread of genes is more uncontrollable and less conscious. However, Koepsells section on drawbacks is not as positive as one might trust it is interspersed with language like will improve, scientific breakthrough, and testing should be employed (Koepsell 13-15). One can pronounce immediately that this section on drawbacks is not a value-neutral account of the actual dangers of the technology, but is rather nourishment for the authors arguments for more research. Appropriately, this section leads into considerations of justice and equity, which are two primary ethical concerns of scientific research. The author considers straw-man situations such as those found in science fiction to dispute the theory of a genetically-derived underclass, and begins to acknowledge the difficulty of trusting policymakers to provide rational oversight and regulation of germlin e modifications in humans (18). The aim of regulation, the author contends, is to provide a just and equitable distribution of benefits to a society. Accordingly, instead of having only the blue able